MSHA Fines Triple With 1 Awful Tactic (And What To Do About It)

Updated on June 17, 2016 by MSC

MSHA Fines tricky tactic

How A Few Words Cost Thousands in MSHA Fines

MSHA inspectors are at your mine for one reason: to find violations and write tickets. Once they find a violation, they must determine how they should mark the violation to assess MSHA fines.

One of the major determining factors for marking MSHA fines as “Negligence” or “High Negligence” is how long management knew about a violation without taking action. When I was an MSHA inspector I would always ask “How long has that existed?” when writing a ticket. Many times inspectors will suggest how long a violation existed. Something like, “It looks like that’s been broken for a few years, don’t you think?”

This is where you can really step in it.

Some managers agree thinking it will get the inspector off the property faster. Instead, they may have tripled the MSHA fine up to $242,000.

How? You probably already know. The manager confirmed a time frame.

If you don’t know how long a violation has existed that should be your answer, “I don’t know.” Nothing more.

I’ve seen 3 words cost a mine operator $7,000. Here’s How:

To fill fuel the tank at this mine, a person must climb a ladder with a fuel hose. Recently, an inspector came to the site and pointed out that the person climbing the ladder can’t keep 3 points of contact because they need one hand to hold the fuel hose.

While the inspector is right and the tank should be (and was) corrected, this fuel tank has been repeatedly inspected for literally decades with no warnings, no MSHA citations, and no MSHA fines.

The inspector then asked my client, “How long has this tank been like that?” This leading question prompted the 3 words that cost my client $7,000.

“Heck, 25 years.”

MSHA Fines tricky tactic dumb move

By agreeing to a time frame, he acknowledged that he knew a violation existed and did nothing to fix it – even if he didn’t know it was a violation. And that is how a violation escalates from low or moderate negligence to high negligence or reckless disregard.

(Oh, and since you’re in management, making this mistake can also expose you to personal MSHA fines – going after YOUR bank account – as high as $242,000. But that’s another post.)

What he should have said was…

“That was a violation? I didn’t know. No one has ever said that was a violation before.” Don’t accept the premise of his leading question.

MSHA fines article sign up button

You can even lose money when the inspector is wrong

That’s right. You can lose money if an inspector incorrectly cites a condition as a violation.

I’ll give you an example from a client in the northwest.

At this particular mine there is roadway on top of a hill with a slope on either side. A little while ago a new inspector was at this mine and decided this roadway needed berms and the mine was in violation. The inspector asked how long the road had been like this. The owner’s response?

“About 30 years.”

double facepalm

That’s a major MSHA fine. It’s also incorrect.

The MSHA regulation for berms states:

30 cfr 56.9300(a) – Berms or guardrails shall be provided and maintained on the banks of roadways where a drop-off exists of sufficient grade or depth to cause a vehicle to overturn or endanger persons in equipment.

This roadway was compliant with MSHA regulations. Unfortunately, my client accepted the premise of this inspector’s question. Even though it wasn’t a violation the mine operator received a $23,000 ticket.

Yes, the operator can fight the ticket and win. But legal fees will cost almost as much as the ticket and take a significant investment of his time. Going to court also comes with a big risk. Depending on the judge, he could lose his case which would cause him to pay the ticket AND his attorney.

msha fines gavel-and-money

Prevent MSHA Fines By Spotting Incorrect MSHA Citations Before They’re Filed

He should have argued the ticket on the spot with something like, “What’s the problem? You guys have inspected my site for years and that’s never been an issue. Why didn’t all the other inspectors think this was a violation?”

If after this conversation the inspector still believes it’s a violation, the operator should have been issued a warning with the chance to re-mediate.

But because he slipped up, this operator paid the fine plus the cost of fixing the berm (which also caused weeks of downtime).

The simple question of “how long has that existed?” opens a nasty can of worms.

If someone at your site falls into this trap you’ll be getting a visit from a Special Investigator.

How is a Special Investigator different than an MSHA Inspector and what should you do if one is on your site? That’s a topic for another day.

MSHA Fines article

Need MSHA Training Fast?

Get Started With A Free Trial of Part 46 Training For Busy People